James Walker James Walker's Profile Page

James Walker James Walker

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

Golden Opportunity to Get Big Discount on Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Questions with 365 days Free Updates

Amazon is obliged to give you 12 months of free update checks to ensure the validity and accuracy of the Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate exam dumps. We also offer you a 100% money-back guarantee, in the very rare case of failure or unsatisfactory results. This puts your mind at ease when you are Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Exam preparing with us.

To address the problems of Data-Engineer-Associate exam candidates who are busy, BraindumpsIT has made the Data-Engineer-Associate dumps PDF format of real AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) (Data-Engineer-Associate) exam questions. This format's feature to run on all smart devices saves your time. Because of this, the portability of Data-Engineer-Associate dumps PDF aids in your preparation regardless of place and time restrictions. The second advantageous feature of the Data-Engineer-Associate Questions Pdf document is the ability to print AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) (Data-Engineer-Associate) exam dumps to avoid eye strain due to the usage of smart devices.

>> Data-Engineer-Associate Instant Download <<

AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) exam pdf guide & Data-Engineer-Associate prep sure exam

This kind of prep method is effective when preparing for the Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate certification exam since the cert demands polished skills and an inside-out understanding of the syllabus. These skills can be achieved when you go through intensive Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Exam Training and attempt actual Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate.

Amazon AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) Sample Questions (Q25-Q30):

NEW QUESTION # 25
A data engineer needs to join data from multiple sources to perform a one-time analysis job. The data is stored in Amazon DynamoDB, Amazon RDS, Amazon Redshift, and Amazon S3.
Which solution will meet this requirement MOST cost-effectively?

A. Use Redshift Spectrum to query data from DynamoDB, Amazon RDS, and Amazon S3 directly from Redshift.
B. Use an Amazon EMR provisioned cluster to read from all sources. Use Apache Spark to join the data and perform the analysis.
C. Copy the data from DynamoDB, Amazon RDS, and Amazon Redshift into Amazon S3. Run Amazon Athena queries directly on the S3 files.
D. Use Amazon Athena Federated Query to join the data from all data sources.

Answer: D

Explanation:
Amazon Athena Federated Query is a feature that allows you to query data from multiple sources using standard SQL. You can use Athena Federated Query to join data from Amazon DynamoDB, Amazon RDS, Amazon Redshift, and Amazon S3, as well as other data sources such as MongoDB, Apache HBase, and Apache Kafka1. Athena Federated Query is a serverless and interactive service, meaning you do not need to provision or manage any infrastructure, and you only pay for the amount of data scanned by your queries.
Athena Federated Query is the most cost-effective solution for performing a one-time analysis job on data from multiple sources, as it eliminates the need to copy or move data, and allows you to query data directly from the source.
The other options are not as cost-effective as Athena Federated Query, as they involve additional steps or costs. Option A requires you to provision and pay for an Amazon EMR cluster, which can be expensive and time-consuming for a one-time job. Option B requires you to copy or move data from DynamoDB, RDS, and Redshift to S3, which can incur additional costs for data transfer and storage, and also introduce latency and complexity. Option D requires you to have an existing Redshift cluster, which can be costly and may not be necessary for a one-time job. Option D also does not supportquerying data from RDS directly, so you would need to use Redshift Federated Query to access RDS data, which adds another layer of complexity2.
References:
Amazon Athena Federated Query
Redshift Spectrum vs Federated Query

NEW QUESTION # 26
The company stores a large volume of customer records in Amazon S3. To comply with regulations, the company must be able to access new customer records immediately for the first 30 days after the records are created. The company accesses records that are older than 30 days infrequently.
The company needs to cost-optimize its Amazon S3 storage.
Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?

A. Use S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) storage for all customer records.
B. Transition records to S3 Glacier Deep Archive storage after 30 days.
C. Use S3 Intelligent-Tiering storage.
D. Apply a lifecycle policy to transition records to S3 Standard Infrequent-Access (S3 Standard-IA) storage after 30 days.

Answer: D

Explanation:
The most cost-effective solution in this case is to apply a lifecycle policy to transition records to Amazon S3 Standard-IA storage after 30 days. Here's why:
Amazon S3 Lifecycle Policies: Amazon S3 offers lifecycle policies that allow you to automatically transition objects between different storage classes to optimize costs. For data that is frequently accessed in the first 30 days and infrequently accessed after that, transitioning from the S3 Standard storage class to S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) after 30 days makes the most sense. S3 Standard-IA is designed for data that is accessed less frequently but still needs to be retained, offering lower storage costs than S3 Standard with a retrieval cost for access.
Cost Optimization: S3 Standard-IA offers a lower price per GB than S3 Standard. Since the data will be accessed infrequently after 30 days, using S3 Standard-IA will lower storage costs while still allowing for immediate retrieval when necessary.
Compliance with Regulations: Since the records need to be immediately accessible for the first 30 days, the use of S3 Standard for that period ensures compliance with regulatory requirements. After 30 days, transitioning to S3 Standard-IA continues to meet access requirements for infrequent access while reducing storage costs.
Alternatives Considered:
Option B (S3 Intelligent-Tiering): While S3 Intelligent-Tiering automatically moves data between access tiers based on access patterns, it incurs a small monthly monitoring and automation charge per object. It could be a viable option, but transitioning data to S3 Standard-IA directly would be more cost-effective since the pattern of access is well-known (frequent for 30 days, infrequent thereafter).
Option C (S3 Glacier Deep Archive): Glacier Deep Archive is the lowest-cost storage class, but it is not suitable in this case because the data needs to be accessed immediately within 30 days and on an infrequent basis thereafter. Glacier Deep Archive requires hours for data retrieval, which is not acceptable for infrequent access needs.
Option D (S3 Standard-IA for all records): Using S3 Standard-IA for all records would result in higher costs for the first 30 days, as the data is frequently accessed. S3 Standard-IA incurs retrieval charges, making it less suitable for frequently accessed data.
Reference:
Amazon S3 Lifecycle Policies
S3 Storage Classes
Cost Management and Data Optimization Using Lifecycle Policies
AWS Data Engineering Documentation

NEW QUESTION # 27
A company loads transaction data for each day into Amazon Redshift tables at the end of each day. The company wants to have the ability to track which tables have been loaded and which tables still need to be loaded.
A data engineer wants to store the load statuses of Redshift tables in an Amazon DynamoDB table. The data engineer creates an AWS Lambda function to publish the details of the load statuses to DynamoDB.
How should the data engineer invoke the Lambda function to write load statuses to the DynamoDB table?

A. Use a second Lambda function to invoke the first Lambda function based on AWS CloudTrail events.
B. Use a second Lambda function to invoke the first Lambda function based on Amazon CloudWatch events.
C. Use the Amazon Redshift Data API to publish an event to Amazon EventBridqe. Configure an EventBridge rule to invoke the Lambda function.
D. Use the Amazon Redshift Data API to publish a message to an Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) queue. Configure the SQS queue to invoke the Lambda function.

Answer: C

Explanation:
The Amazon Redshift Data API enables you to interact with your Amazon Redshift data warehouse in an easy and secure way. You can use the Data API to run SQL commands, such as loading data into tables, without requiring a persistent connection to the cluster. The Data API also integrates with Amazon EventBridge, which allows you to monitor the execution status of your SQL commands and trigger actions based on events. By using the Data API to publish an event to EventBridge, the data engineer can invoke the Lambda function that writes the load statuses to the DynamoDB table. This solution is scalable, reliable, and cost-effective. The other options are either not possible or not optimal. You cannot use a second Lambda function to invoke the first Lambda function based on CloudWatch or CloudTrail events, as these services do not capture the load status of Redshift tables. You can use the Data API to publish a message to an SQS queue, but this would require additional configuration and polling logic to invoke the Lambda function from the queue. This would also introduce additional latency and cost. References:
Using the Amazon Redshift Data API
Using Amazon EventBridge with Amazon Redshift
AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide, Chapter 2: Data Store Management, Section 2.2: Amazon Redshift

NEW QUESTION # 28
A gaming company uses Amazon Kinesis Data Streams to collect clickstream data. The company uses Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose delivery streams to store the data in JSON format in Amazon S3. Data scientists at the company use Amazon Athena to query the most recent data to obtain business insights.
The company wants to reduce Athena costs but does not want to recreate the data pipeline.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST management effort?

A. Change the Firehose output format to Apache Parquet. Provide a custom S3 object YYYYMMDD prefix expression and specify a large buffer size. For the existing data, create an AWS Glue extract, transform, and load (ETL) job. Configure the ETL job to combine small JSON files, convert the JSON files to large Parquet files, and add the YYYYMMDD prefix. Use the ALTER TABLE ADD PARTITION statement to reflect the partition on the existing Athena table.
B. Integrate an AWS Lambda function with Firehose to convert source records to Apache Parquet and write them to Amazon S3. In parallel, run an AWS Glue extract, transform, and load (ETL) job to combine the JSON files and convert the JSON files to large Parquet files. Create a custom S3 object YYYYMMDD prefix. Use the ALTER TABLE ADD PARTITION statement to reflect the partition on the existing Athena table.
C. Create a Kinesis data stream as a delivery destination for Firehose. Use Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink (previously known as Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics) to run Apache Flink on the Kinesis data stream. Use Flink to aggregate the data and save the data to Amazon S3 in Apache Parquet format with a custom S3 object YYYYMMDD prefix. Use the ALTER TABLE ADD PARTITION statement to reflect the partition on the existing Athena table.
D. Create an Apache Spark job that combines JSON files and converts the JSON files to Apache Parquet files. Launch an Amazon EMR ephemeral cluster every day to run the Spark job to create new Parquet files in a different S3 location. Use the ALTER TABLE SET LOCATION statement to reflect the new S3 location on the existing Athena table.

Answer: A

Explanation:
Step 1: Understanding the Problem
The company collects clickstream data via Amazon Kinesis Data Streams and stores it in JSON format in Amazon S3 using Kinesis Data Firehose. They use Amazon Athena to query the data, but they want to reduce Athena costs while maintaining the same data pipeline.
Since Athena charges based on the amount of data scanned during queries, reducing the data size (by converting JSON to a more efficient format like Apache Parquet) is a key solution to lowering costs.
Step 2: Why Option A is Correct
Option A provides a straightforward way to reduce costs with minimal management overhead:
Changing the Firehose output format to Parquet: Parquet is a columnar data format, which is more compact and efficient than JSON for Athena queries. It significantly reduces the amount of data scanned, which in turn reduces Athena query costs.
Custom S3 Object Prefix (YYYYMMDD): Adding a date-based prefix helps in partitioning the data, which further improves query efficiency in Athena by limiting the data scanned to only relevant partitions.
AWS Glue ETL Job for Existing Data: To handle existing data stored in JSON format, a one-time AWS Glue ETL job can combine small JSON files, convert them to Parquet, and apply the YYYYMMDD prefix. This ensures consistency in the S3 bucket structure and allows Athena to efficiently query historical data.
ALTER TABLE ADD PARTITION: This command updates Athena's table metadata to reflect the new partitions, ensuring that future queries target only the required data.
Step 3: Why Other Options Are Not Ideal
Option B (Apache Spark on EMR) introduces higher management effort by requiring the setup of Apache Spark jobs and an Amazon EMR cluster. While it achieves the goal of converting JSON to Parquet, it involves running and maintaining an EMR cluster, which adds operational complexity.
Option C (Kinesis and Apache Flink) is a more complex solution involving Apache Flink, which adds a real-time streaming layer to aggregate data. Although Flink is a powerful tool for stream processing, it adds unnecessary overhead in this scenario since the company already uses Kinesis Data Firehose for batch delivery to S3.
Option D (AWS Lambda with Firehose) suggests using AWS Lambda to convert records in real time. While Lambda can work in some cases, it's generally not the best tool for handling large-scale data transformations like JSON-to-Parquet conversion due to potential scaling and invocation limitations. Additionally, running parallel Glue jobs further complicates the setup.
Step 4: How Option A Minimizes Costs
By using Apache Parquet, Athena queries become more efficient, as Athena will scan significantly less data, directly reducing query costs.
Firehose natively supports Parquet as an output format, so enabling this conversion in Firehose requires minimal effort. Once set, new data will automatically be stored in Parquet format in S3, without requiring any custom coding or ongoing management.
The AWS Glue ETL job for historical data ensures that existing JSON files are also converted to Parquet format, ensuring consistency across the data stored in S3.
Conclusion:
Option A meets the requirement to reduce Athena costs without recreating the data pipeline, using Firehose's native support for Apache Parquet and a simple one-time AWS Glue ETL job for existing data. This approach involves minimal management effort compared to the other solutions.

NEW QUESTION # 29
A company uses Amazon Athena for one-time queries against data that is in Amazon S3. The company has several use cases. The company must implement permission controls to separate query processes and access to query history among users, teams, and applications that are in the same AWS account.
Which solution will meet these requirements?

A. Create an AWS Glue Data Catalog resource policy that grants permissions to appropriate individual IAM users for each use case. Apply the resource policy to the specific tables that Athena uses.
B. Create an Athena workgroup for each use case. Apply tags to the workgroup. Create an 1AM policy that uses the tags to apply appropriate permissions to the workgroup.
C. Create an JAM role for each use case. Assign appropriate permissions to the role for each use case. Associate the role with Athena.
D. Create an S3 bucket for each use case. Create an S3 bucket policy that grants permissions to appropriate individual IAM users. Apply the S3 bucket policy to the S3 bucket.

Answer: B

Explanation:
Athena workgroups are a way to isolate query execution and query history among users, teams, and applications that share the same AWS account. By creating a workgroup for each use case, the company can control the access and actions on the workgroup resource using resource-level IAM permissions or identity-based IAM policies. The company can also use tags to organize and identify the workgroups, and use them as conditions in the IAM policies to grant or deny permissions to the workgroup. This solution meets the requirements of separating query processes and access to query history among users, teams, and applications that are in the same AWS account. Reference:
Athena Workgroups
IAM policies for accessing workgroups
Workgroup example policies

NEW QUESTION # 30
......

So no matter what kinds of Data-Engineer-Associate Test Torrent you may ask, our after sale service staffs will help you to solve your problems in the most professional way. Since our customers aiming to Data-Engineer-Associate study tool is from different countries in the world, and there is definitely time difference among us, we will provide considerate online after-sale service twenty four hours a day, seven days a week, please just feel free to contact with us anywhere at any time.

Latest Data-Engineer-Associate Dumps Book: https://www.braindumpsit.com/Data-Engineer-Associate_real-exam.html

Our candidates comment that our Data-Engineer-Associate exam pdf covers almost 90% questions in the real exam and only few new questions appeared, If you do not pass the Data-Engineer-Associate exam (Podcast and Streamed Internet Media Administration Exam) on your first attempt we will give you a FULL REFUND of your purchasing fee,if you purchase Data-Engineer-Associate exam dump,enjoy the upgrade this exam Q&A service for free in one year, If you have any problem about our Data-Engineer-Associate exam resources, please feel free to contact with us and we will solve them for you with respect and great manner.

Drag the bookmark icon directly up and above the first bookmark in your Bookmarks Data-Engineer-Associate list, Although those companies might share their web traffic information with you, it's more likely that they regard it as proprietary.

Experience the real Amazon exam environment with our web-based Data-Engineer-Associate practice test

Our candidates comment that our Data-Engineer-Associate exam pdf covers almost 90% questions in the real exam and only few new questions appeared, If you do not pass the Data-Engineer-Associate Exam (Podcast and Streamed Internet Media Administration Exam) on your first attempt we will give you a FULL REFUND of your purchasing fee,if you purchase Data-Engineer-Associate exam dump,enjoy the upgrade this exam Q&A service for free in one year.

If you have any problem about our Data-Engineer-Associate exam resources, please feel free to contact with us and we will solve them for you with respect and great manner, We have prepared three different versions of our Data-Engineer-Associate quiz torrent: AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) for our customers in accordance with the tastes of different people from different countries in the world, among which the most noteworthy is the software version of Data-Engineer-Associate test braindumps, because the simulation test is available in our software version.

Our Data-Engineer-Associate exam cram will help you clear exams at first attempt and save a lot of time for you.

James Walker James Walker

Biography

Subscribe

All Access Membership